Monoket

By Y. Charles. Western Baptist College. 2017.

RACQUET SPORTS Some clubs require eye protection for badminton effective 20 mg monoket, BASEBALL/SOFTBALL squash, and racquetball players. When a lens in a sports frame is struck, it proj- coaches, and on-deck hitters. This recommendation was Mouth guards are recommended, but not mandatory, originally made in 1984 by the Sports Eye Safety Com- to reduce risk of dental trauma. ICE HOCKEY The NCAA mandates the use of helmets with fastened WRESTLING chin straps, face masks, and an internal mouthpiece. Shin guards should pro- vical spine injuries (Reynen and Clancy, Jr, 1994). CHAPTER 17 PLAYING SURFACE AND PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 105 Mouth guards are recommended, especially for goal- natural grass and tartan turf. Am J Sports Med 8(1):43–47, keepers, to protect against not only dental injury but 1980. Kulund DN, Athletic injuries to the head, face, and neck, in Kulund DN (ed. Naftulin S, McKeag DB: Protective equipment: Baseball, soft- ball, hockey, wrestling, and lacrosse, in Morris MB (ed. Nicola TL: Tennis, in Mellion MB, Walsh WM, Shelton GL Albright JP, Powell JW, Smith W, et al: Medial collateral liga- (eds. Philadelphia, ment knee sprains in college football: Effectiveness of preven- PA, Hanley & Belfus, 1997, pp 816–827. Powell JW, Schootman M: A multivariate risk analysis of American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Sports selected playing surfaces in the National Football League: Medicine: Knee brace use by athletes. Am J Barret JR, Tanji JL, Drake C, et al: High- versus low-top shoes for Sports Med 20(6):686–694, 1992.

This sequence is logical and naturally provides a good format in which to introduce your story cheap monoket 40 mg on-line. Paragraph 1: What we know Paragraph 2: What we don’t know Paragraph 3: Why we did this study Figure 3. Topic sentences, especially for the first introductory sentence, are a great help. Richard Smith, editor of the BMJ, stresses the importance of trying as hard as you can to hook your readers in the first line. Few readers want to plough through a detailed history of your research area that goes over two or more pages. In the introduction section, you do not need to review all of the literature available, although you do need to find it all and read it in the context of writing the entire paper. In appraising the literature, it is important to discard the scientifically weak studies and only draw evidence from the most rigorous, most relevant, and most valid studies. Ideally, you should have done a thorough literature search before you began the study and have updated it along the way. This will be invaluable in helping you to write a pertinent introduction. You should avoid including a lot of material in the introduction section that would be better addressed in the discussion. You should never be tempted to put “text book” knowledge into your introduction because readers will not want to be told basic information that they already know. For example, the sentence, Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood, must be one of the most overused phrases in the last decade. All scientists working in asthma research and most people in the community already know this and don’t want to be told it yet again. Similarly, a phrase that defines the problem such as, Asthma is a condition in which the airways narrow in response to commonly occurring environmental stimuli, is not appropriate, except in a paper about the mechanisms of airway narrowing. It is much better to put your study in the context in which it will be published. For example, an introductory sentence such as, The mould Alternaria occurs ubiquitously in dry regions and is thought to be important in exacerbating symptoms of asthma, defines the background behind this particular research study.